Please review the proposals for the following last call issues 669 [1], 670 [2], 676 [3], and 875[4]. Note that 875 may need some additional discussion. We need to determine if fieldset and legend are required for all related radio elements and checkboxes. I took the stance that small related groups with instructions and descriptive labels may not require fieldset and legend. I realize that this may be controversial and need further discussion within the group. A proposal for 763[5] was submitted to team c on June 19 [6] but I'm not sure if it was ever discussed or surveyed? I provided two possible solutions for 682[7] - please review so we can discuss at the Team C meeting. [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=669 [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=670 [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=676 [4] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=875 [5] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=763 [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2006Jun/0039.html [7] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=682 Becky Gibson Web Accessibility Architect IBM Emerging Internet Technologies 5 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101 Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.comReceived on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 15:39:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:55:39 UTC