Re: Updated intent for 2.1.2

I am a little bit concerned about the undesirable precedent of creating a 
requirement (SC2.1.2) for which no "sufficient" techniques exist .   Should 
a requirement be created if there are no specifics given as to how to meet 
the requirement as stated?  Or am I misunderstanding the discussion (if so, 

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

  At 12:04 PM 1/11/2006 -0500, you wrote:

>I had an action [1] to survey the group about possible approaches to
>guideline 2.1.2 (see minutes for discussion). In the editors' call
>yesterday, two of the options were excluded. Essentially, no techniques
>are possible for this SC, and it is desirable to retain the success
>criterion. Therefore the remaining option is to clarify the intent of
>the SC. I have proposed wording at [2]. Please comment if this solves
>the problem with this SC.
>--- Signature ---
>Michael Cooper
>Accessibility Product Manager, Watchfire
>1 Hines Rd Suite 200, Kanata, ON  K2K 3C7  Canada
>Tel: +1 (613) 599-3888 x4019
>Fax: +1 (613) 599-4661

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 17:15:49 UTC