- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:42:26 -0500
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
I think we may need to clarify what it means to "update" content?
The definition of "update" I found (from Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary)
is to "bring up to date", so there needs to be
some way of explicitly associating a date/time with content in a verifiable
way,
such that the content is "current" or ("accurate") as of this date/time, and
possibly for how long this content will be considered "current" (time window)..
Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST
At 11:31 PM 2/20/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>Took a stab at "Allowing users to request updates instead of automatically
>updating content". Setting a preference for periodic updates seems
>repetitive with the technique on postponing updates. I think we should
>simplify this technique and make it only about providing an explicit way
>(like a button) for users to request updates.
>
>Please review and add comments to the wiki
><http://tinyurl.com/q4nxb>.
>
>Andi
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 14:42:49 UTC