- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:00:33 -0600
- To: "'Andi Snow-Weaver'" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Human test is fine if not something that can be auto tested. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 5:45 PM To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org Subject: Andi's work items * Failure due to using server-side techniques to automatically redirect pages after a timeout <http://tinyurl.com/ddts8> There are two deprecated examples on this technique and no test procedure. I am not qualified to say whether or not the examples are good. Cynthia put a note in there that she had tested the technique on several browsers. Her note is not attached to the examples though so I'm not sure if she means she tested that specific code. There is no test procedure. I'm not clear on what we are supposed to do for test procedures. Are we supposed to be describing how a human would test it or what code an evalutation tool would scan for in order to determine failure? I proposed some steps that a human would use but I'm just not sure if that's what we're looking for here. * Ensuring content blinks for less than three seconds <http://tinyurl.com/az2gd> This one seems good to go to me. Andi andisnow@us.ibm.com IBM Accessibility Center (512) 838-9903, http://www.ibm.com/able Internal Tie Line 678-9903, http://w3.austin.ibm.com/~snsinfo
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:00:40 UTC