- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:40:03 -0500
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Cc: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
I think we have a little bit of redundancy with using both "expected" and
"required". How about "data format or values required by...".
I don't think we have consensus yet on using web site vs. delivery unit vs.
Web site so I've included both
So then we have:
input error: any information provided by the user that is not accepted by
the Web site/delivery unit. This includes:
1. information that is required by the Web site/delivery unit but omitted
by the user.
2. information that is provided by the user but that falls outside the data
format or values required by the Web site/delivery unit.
Do we even have to say "by anything"?
Could we just say
input error: any information provided by the user that is not accepted.
This includes:
1. information that is required but omitted by the user.
2. information that is provided by the user but that falls outside the
required data format or values.
Andi
andisnow@us.ibm.com
IBM Accessibility Center
(512) 838-9903, http://www.ibm.com/able
Internal Tie Line 678-9903, http://w3.austin.ibm.com/~snsinfo
"John M Slatin"
<john_slatin@aust
in.utexas.edu> To
Sent by: "Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -"
public-wcag-teamc <ueki@infoaxia.co.jp>,
-request@w3.org <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
cc
09/23/2005 09:40 Subject
AM RE: revised proposed definition of
"input error" - action item
Andi wroteproposed the following definition of input error:
<blockquote>
> input error: any information provided by the user that is not accepted
> by the Web site. This includes: 1. information that is required by the
> Web site but omitted by the user. 2. information that is provided by
> the user but that falls outside the expected format or
> content parameters required by the Web site.
</blockquote>
I like the definition, but agree with Makoto that we should say
"delivery unit" instead of "Web site."
Also, I'm not sure I understand what "content parameters" means. Would
"expected values" work instead? (Forgive me if this is something Team C
has gone 'round and 'round about...)
John
"Good design is accessible design."
Dr. John M. Slatin, Director
Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility
-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Makoto UEKI -
Infoaxia, Inc. -
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:34 PM
To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Subject: Re: revised proposed definition of "input error" - action item
Andi's definition is most understandable for me. However, can we say
"Web site" in our document? Should we use "delivery unit" instead of
"Web site"?
- Makoto
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:04:26 -0500
Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The bottom line is that an input error is whatever the code checking
> the input decides is an error. How about:
>
> input error: any information provided by the user that is not accepted
> by the Web site. This includes: 1. information that is required by the
> Web site but omitted by the user. 2. information that is provided by
> the user but that falls outside the expected format or
> content parameters required by the Web site.
>
> Andi
> andisnow@us.ibm.com
> IBM Accessibility Center
> (512) 838-9903, http://www.ibm.com/able
> Internal Tie Line 678-9903, http://w3.austin.ibm.com/~snsinfo
>
>
>
> "Sofia Celic"
> <sofia.celic@nils
> .org.au>
To
> Sent by: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
> public-wcag-teamc
cc
> -request@w3.org
>
Subject
> Re: revised proposed definition
of
> 09/21/2005 05:44 "input error" - action item
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> sofia.celic
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the definition of "input error" has to define both components
> of the phrase (1. it's an error, and 2. as a result of user effort),
> and so I like parts of both Michael's and Tim's suggestions.
>
> Also, how about using terms less along the lines of programming
> terminology? For example, use "information" instead of "data". The
> user is entering information. It may get treated as data.
>
> So I have a third suggestion:
>
> input error: information entered or omitted by the user that falls
> outside the programmed scope.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sofia
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 14:40:36 UTC