- From: <Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:09:27 +1000
- To: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
sorry, I omitted "the user" from my suggestion. So the suggested SC wording would read: "If an input error is detected, the error is identified and described to the user." Sofia ----- Forwarded by Sofia Celic/Kooyong/AFTB on 05/10/2005 03:07 PM ----- |---------+--------------------------------> | | "Sofia Celic" | | | <sofia.celic@nils.org| | | .au> | | | Sent by: | | | public-wcag-teamc-req| | | uest@w3.org | | | | | | | | | 05/10/2005 03:05 PM | | | Please respond to | | | sofia.celic | | | | |---------+--------------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org> | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Draft of guide doc for GL 2.5 L2 SC 1 (UPDATED based on comments received last week) | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi Andi, Regarding Christophe's comment: How about we shorten the SC to "If an input error is detected, the error is identified and described." ? The Guide doc can explain that the intent of the SC is to identify and describe the error(s) but the manner in which this is done should meet other SCs. Then some technology/modality specific techniques can be used to illustrate this. Sofia
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 05:09:49 UTC