Re: RE: SC 2.4.6 wording from Tim Boland on 2007-03-05 (public-wcag-teamb@w3.org from March 2007)

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:41:26 -0500
To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "Slatin, John M" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, TeamB <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20070305093058.014b7998@mailserver.nist.gov>

There may be multiple reading orders..  Do we want to say "receive focus in 
an order
that is the same as a reading order"?

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

PS: If we're talking about tabindex, the WAI-ARIA specs may be of interest.
Can provide URLs if needed..

  At 05:43 PM 3/4/2007 -0800, Loretta Guarino Reid wrote:

>Let me take another crack at the wording of SC 2.4.6. Is this getting
>any closer to what we mean?
>
>
>1.3.3 Meaningful Sequence: When the sequence in which content is
>presented affects its meaning, when the content is navigated
>sequentially, the interactive components within that content receive
>focus in an order that is consistent with the
>programmatically-determined reading order.
>
>
>(This is still very difficult to parse; suggestions for clearer
>wording welcome...)
>

Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 14:42:08 UTC