- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:56:12 -0600
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>, "'Sean Hayes'" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "'Gez Lemon'" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "'Slatin, John M'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'TeamB'" <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Side note Is there only one 'programmatically determined' reading order? Seems like there could be multiple in a table for example. If you mean the order that the code appears in the source file then that may not be the order that is presented or even a logical presentation order. When you think cross technology this one gets very complicated. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Loretta Guarino Reid > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:43 PM > To: Sean Hayes > Cc: Gez Lemon; Slatin, John M; TeamB > Subject: Re: RE: SC 2.4.6 wording > > > Let me take another crack at the wording of SC 2.4.6. Is this > getting any closer to what we mean? > > > 1.3.3 Meaningful Sequence: When the sequence in which content > is presented affects its meaning, when the content is > navigated sequentially, the interactive components within > that content receive focus in an order that is consistent > with the programmatically-determined reading order. > > > (This is still very difficult to parse; suggestions for > clearer wording welcome...) > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 03:56:22 UTC