RE: 30 Jan 2007 Team B Meeting

I would guess that 2x would have translation challenges.  Is “twice the relative size” clear?  It was not obvious to me that we had solved the conundrum of (twice the point size) versus (twice the area) versus (twice both vertical and horrizontal measurements).  I was left with impression that someone thought they had a handle on this.

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] 
 Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 9:47 AM 
 To: Bailey, Bruce 
 Cc: Makoto Ueki; TeamB 
 Subject: Re: 30 Jan 2007 Team B Meeting
 
 

 Thanks, Bruce. I thought that older screen magnifiers started at 2X, 
 and it is good to have confirmation of that. I think we might add that 
 to the rationale for why 200%. 

 Also, do you think we should be using 2X rather than 200% in the 
 success criteria? Will that we clearer? Can you suggest phrasing? 

 Loretta