RE: LC-969 and SC 3.2.2

Ah. 

I see.   One thing we wanted to allow was that you could put the warning at
the front of a string of pages that were all data entry for example, and it
wouldn't have to be repeated on each page.  The programmatically associated
would prevent that. 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:40 AM
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden
> Cc: Loretta Guarino Reid; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: Re: LC-969 and SC 3.2.2
> 
> 
> On 02/10/06, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:
> > This is for all disabilities - most of whom don't use AT 
> and wouldn't 'see'
> > and programmatically associated warnings.
> 
> The warning is in the content - everyone should be able to 
> 'see' it, including AT. My suggestions is to take the warning 
> the guideline already requires, and ensure it's 
> programmatically associated with its control.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gez
> 
> --
> _____________________________
> Supplement your vitamins
> http://juicystudio.com
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 16:56:57 UTC