- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0500
- To: "'Katie Haritos-Shea'" <kharitos-shea@cri-solutions.com>, "'Gez Lemon'" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <ryladog@earthlink.net>
- Cc: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003201c69ad4$74022640$8b17a8c0@NC6000BAK>
My suggestion was only a SUFFICIENT technique. It would mean that if you did this it would be sufficient. A sufficient technique doesn't not mean the only way. Just one acceptable way. I only mentioned this technique so that we had one way we could count on for alternate forms that were completely inaccessible. I was concerned that there was not method without it. But other methods could exist -- like content negotiation with accessible version as default that we discussed before. Or in the future - all browsers could support an "alternate accessible" button or something. Does that help? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Katie Haritos-Shea Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:38 AM To: Gez Lemon; ryladog@earthlink.net Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: RE: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3 Gez, Not to worry for noe then. Thanks for giving it a look. Hopefully the full group will get to this survey tomorrow and Gregg will clarify his point. Team B will take note of this * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Section 508 Technical Policy Analyst Communications Resource, Inc. (CRI) CRI Email: kharitos-shea@cri-solutions.com U.S. Department of Treasury - Financial Management Service Information Resources - IT Policies & Standards Branch Section 508 Support Phone: 202-874-3203 FMS Email: mailto:Katie.Haritos-Shea@fms.treas.gov Location: 10E24 CRI Headquarters 8280 Greensboro Drive, Suite 400 McLean, Virginia 22102 CRI Email: mailto:kharitos-shea@cri-solutions.com _____ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org on behalf of Gez Lemon Sent: Wed 6/28/2006 9:29 AM To: ryladog@earthlink.net Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Re: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3 Hi Katie, I'm sorry, but I'm having difficulty trying to understand this. > Comments 465, 466, 545 were accepted (11 - 1 - 0), Gregg > had a question that Ben answered. We would like to ask you if would not mind > confirming Ben's comment "I believe Gregg's question is covered by the > situations described in How to meet 4.2.1.", and updating that in the > Comments Database for those issues. I don't understand Gregg's suggestion - doesn't it imply that only HTML could be considered accessible? Would that not undermine the whole technology neutral aspect of the guidelines? If it was a reasonable assumption, I wouldn't have thought it was considered discoverable (what would make people change an extension in the hope that the next resource they received was accessible?). Whereabouts in the "How to meet 4.2.1" section does Ben believe this is covered? Situation A and B don't describe changing the end of the URL to .html. I'm sure I'm missing the point somewhere, but I don't know what to suggest, as I don't understand the suggestion or where the suggestion has been addressed. Best regards, Gez On 27/06/06, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net> wrote: > Gez, > > During the full WCAG 2.0 Meeting on June 22, we did not make it to the Team > B Survey because we ran out of time. > > At today's Team B meeting we decided to try to address some of the Results > comments in advance of the July 29th full WCAG 2.0 Meeting. Though your > great responses to Comments 465, 466, 545 were accepted (11 - 1 - 0), Gregg > had a question that Ben answered. We would like to ask you if would not mind > confirming Ben's comment "I believe Gregg's question is covered by the > situations described in How to meet 4.2.1.", and updating that in the > Comments Database for those issues. > > Team B Survey for June 22: > (http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/teamb062206/results). > > > Thanks...........Katie > > > Katie Haritos-Shea > > ryladog@earthlink.net > > > -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com <http://juicystudio.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 17:01:24 UTC