Re: My action item from Team B July 26 Teleconference

I might put it at the beginning of the Understanding WGAG2.0 document [1],
since this document contains the "related resources" for each of the
techniques.

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/

I might also put it at the beginning of the WCAG2.0 Techniques document [2]
as well, since each technique has a "resources" part..

[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

At 01:37 PM 7/30/2006 -0700, you wrote:

>Tim, where do you think the disclaimer would go?
>
>Loretta
>
>
>On 7/27/06 5:49 AM, "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov> wrote:
>
> >
> > As an action item from the Team B teleconference on July 26, I was asked to
> > propose some language relating to manage resources included in WCAG WG
> > content. So here goes:
> >
> > (DISCLAIMER?) "Resources listed herein are for information only .The
> > criteria for listing
> > them is that they appear to be relevant to the subject matter in their
> > context of placement. W3C
> > makes no claims or no endorsements re: the quality or accuracy of
> > these resources. Responsibility for the accuracy of these
> > resources/currency of links rests with the submitters."
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Best,
> > Tim Boland
> >
> >
> > PS - I think the questions that need to be asked are: (1) What criteria (if
> > any) are used to place a resource in
> > WCAG WG space?    (2) Who has responsibility for the quality/accuracy of
> > these resources (if they're listed, is
> > that an implicit endorsement by WCAG/W3C?)? (3) How are these resources to
> > be maintained over time?
> >
> >
> >

Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 15:13:23 UTC