My action item from Team B July 26 Teleconference

• From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:49:42 -0400
• To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20060727084319.01f660e0@mailserver.nist.gov>

As an action item from the Team B teleconference on July 26, I was asked to
propose some language relating to manage resources included in WCAG WG
content. So here goes:

(DISCLAIMER?) "Resources listed herein are for information only .The 
criteria for listing
them is that they appear to be relevant to the subject matter in their 
context of placement. W3C
makes no claims or no endorsements re: the quality or accuracy of
these resources. Responsibility for the accuracy of these
resources/currency of links rests with the submitters."

Comments?

Best,
Tim Boland


PS - I think the questions that need to be asked are: (1) What criteria (if 
any) are used to place a resource in
WCAG WG space?    (2) Who has responsibility for the quality/accuracy of 
these resources (if they're listed, is
that an implicit endorsement by WCAG/W3C?)? (3) How are these resources to 
be maintained over time?

Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 12:50:14 UTC