- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:37:58 -0800
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0DAF2B31FBCEB6439F63FA7F91601F7473C727@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
I think that we need 2 properties to be true, and I'm still wrestling with how to express them. 1. We need to be able to programmatically determine when it is safe to change the order of parts of the content, so that alternate presentations don't change the meaning. This is what will need technology-specific techniques. 2. When the sequence of the content affects the meaning, the sequence of <what?> must be meaningful in the first place. I haven't been able to figure out how to phrase the second condition. This is what says that the words in a paragraph must be in a meaningful order. This is what breaks down, for instance, when we try to represent two column text in a simple text document. Is this the source order of the content? What if the technology uses a different order in its source from the order used in rendering? Is it the default render order that needs to have this property? Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering ________________________________ From: John M Slatin [mailto:john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 1:19 PM To: Loretta Guarino Reid; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: RE: SC 1.3.5: meaning-critical sequences Loretta, thanks for walking through this SC so carefully. I think the analysis makes sense. Based on what you've said, I think we need a general technique plus a list of techniques that can be used to make reading order programmatically determined. As you've noted, there are different techniques for different kinds of content (e.g., ordered lists, etc.). YOu've also pointed out that some people find the phrase "meaning-critical sequence" hard to understand. So here's a title for the general technique: <proposedTitle> Defining a programmatically determined reading order when content must be presented in a specific sequence </proposedTitle> In How to Meet SC 1.3.5, this might look like the following: Defining a programmatically determined reading order when content must be presented in a specific sequence AND one or more of the technology-specific techniques listed below. HTML Techniques Using the ol element to present list items in a specific sequence Etc. Thoughts? John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/> ________________________________ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:48 pm To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: SC 1.3.5: meaning-critical sequences The concept that this phrase is trying to communicate is that there is some content for which the order of the content is critical to correctly understanding its meaning. For other content, it is not critical. This is true at different levels of granularity, so that the order within some portion of the content is critical, but the larger units of content can be reordered without affecting meaning. For example, you should be able to change the order of items in an unordered list without affecting its meaning. But not of an ordered list. So an ordered list marks a meaning-critical sequence, but an unordered list does not. Text in a container (paragraph, list item, table cell, etc) is always a meaning-critical sequence. Tables are meaning-critical sequences. The paragraphs in an article are a meaning-critical sequence. The ordering of a navigation bar and a search tool, however, is not meaning-critical. If contents contain images, is there location meaning critical? There are usually (but not always) a number of different places the image could occur in the content without affecting the meaning. For those of you who are more knowledgeable about html and css, how do you know when it is safe to relocate an element in css, and when it is not? (In describing this, I realize that "meaning-critical sequences" is not a good phrase to be using. It makes it sounds as if some sequences or sections of content are critical to meaning, and other sequences or sections of content are not.) In order to understand the content, especially when preparing alternate presentations, 1. We need to be able to programmatically determine when the alternate presentation can safely change the order of the content. (I believe the default for most content in most technologies is that the order cannot be changed.) 2. Where the programmatically determined order of the content can't be changed, we need it to be a meaningful order. The second requirement can really only be checked manually, much like checking whether an alternate description is equivalent to its image. Does this explanation make sense? Does anyone have ideas of alternate wordings for the techniques and/or success criterion that would make it less confusing? Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 00:38:26 UTC