- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:39:35 -0600
- To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Yvette Hoitink'" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Cc: <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3c.org>
To address my "action item" I propose the following At Level 1 have 1.3.2 When information is conveyed by color, the color can be programmatically determined or the information is also conveyed through text. [How to meet 1.3.2] At level 2 we have 1.3.4 Any information that is conveyed by color is visually evident when color is not available. [How to meet 1.3.4] This avoids the problem of using a visual means to satisfy both L1 and L2 resulting in no way for people who are blind to be able to access the information. I pass this to Team B since this is now your area. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: John M Slatin [mailto:john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:32 PM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; Yvette Hoitink Cc: lguarino@adobe.com Subject: Action item re SC 1.3.2 and 1.3.4 (color at L1 and L2) Gregg and Yvette, During the discussion of GL 1.3 on the 15 December call, Yvette discovered a problem with our requirements about information conveyed through color. If I remember right, the problem was that it might be possible to satisfy SC 1.3.4 by making information that is conveyed through color "visually evident" without making it available in non-visual ways-- because that would also satisfy SC 1.3.2 (L1) without making either the information or the color that conveys it programmatically determined. The two of you took an action item to try to come up with new wording. Here's what it says in the minutes: <blockquote> ACTION: Yvette and Gregg to review 1.3.2 and 1.3.4 to address programmatically determined, guaranteeing visual access at level 2 and making the working consistent. </blockquote> This is related to issues 1607 and 1608. GL 1.3 is on the agenda for the 5 January call. Is there any chance that you can send proposed wording to Team B (we're doing GL 1.3) by sometime on Monday 2 January? Or just send it to me and I'll forward to Team B. Thanks! Apologies for badgering you with work items. John "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 08:49:18 UTC