- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:48:18 -0400
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 15:49:10 UTC
> Please review for our meeting. Regrets for missing the call. I am generally in agreement with all proposals. I have no strong objections. wrt 971: The historical problem with ALT was with the noun description. An adjective might have avoided a great deal of heartache. I am not sure this distinction is worth adding to the response. wrt 1110: I agree that “click here” and “read more” links are acceptable for Level 1 conformance with WCAG 2.0. If we include such an example it should be noted that ambiguous link text creates a barrier for some PWDs. wrt 1293: The other problem with the word target was that some people thought there was no requirement that target be human readable. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=971 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1110 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1293
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 15:49:10 UTC