- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:19:29 -0700
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ben Caldwell" <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Message-ID: <0DAF2B31FBCEB6439F63FA7F91601F74AE2AD2@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
Here is an alternate proposal for an additional check in the Site Map test procedure. Ben, do you think this would cover your concerns? For each page in the site, check that the page can be reached by following some chain of links that starts at the site map. Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering ________________________________ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:54 PM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Providing a Site Map I've added the following paragraph to this technique: "A site map describes the contents and organization of a site accurately. It is important that site maps be updated whenever the site is updated. A web page that does not link to all the sections of a site, that presents an organization that is different from the site's organization, or that contains links that are no longer valid is not a valid site map." The current test procedure is: 1. Check that the site contains a site map 2. Check that the links in the site map lead to the corresponding sections of the site 3. For each link in the site map, check that the target page contains a link to the site map Ben also suggested adding something like the following: "Check that the site map describes the content of the site correctly." I'm concerned about whether this is sufficiently testable. Am I being too cautious? Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 22:20:08 UTC