- From: <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:08:50 -0400
- To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF153C8711.8585DFE7-ON8525708A.004D1F29-8525708A.004DC9C6@notesdev.ibm.com>
Attached is a draft guide for GL 3.1 L3 SC2, A mechanism is available for identifying specific definitions of words used in an unusual or restricted way, including idioms and jargon [1]. I'm not completely sure what the sufficient techniques are. At the September 21, 2005, Team B meeting we determined that internal linking OR a glossary link were sufficient. But, what about an on line dictionary reference or dictionary cascade? And, is an HTML definition list sufficient? Currently I have marked any of these as sufficient. I also modified example 2 because originally both examples were related to dictionary cascades. Most of the material was pulled from the existsing Guide for this success criterion [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#meaning-idioms [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/meaning-idioms.html Becky Gibson Web Accessibility Architect IBM Emerging Internet Technologies 5 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101 Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com
Attachments
- text/html attachment: guide31L3SC2.html
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:10:18 UTC