- From: by way of Wendy Chisholm <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:06:36 -0400
- To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
References: http://www.w3.org/mid/E1EEnGr-0005y6-Il@maggie.w3.org and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamb/2005Sep/0015.html Yvette did the right thing in tying our usage to what i18n says by citing http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-i18n-html-tech-lang-20050224/ On the other hand, the link in that document to the replacement for RFC 3066, commonly referred to as RFC 3066bis, is broken. So add http://www.w3.org/TR/itsreq/ to your bibliography for links that work. The moral is that 3066bis introduces improved functionality and will be normative in XML soon so we should be tracking it. Mostly I wanted to pass on the idea from Addison Phillips that this is coming. Further questions should be taken to him. Al
Received on Friday, 23 September 2005 22:06:50 UTC