- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:22:29 +0200
- To: <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Cc: <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Yes, but for "marked" u intend "expanded"? I agree with a phrase like this: <p><acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym> is ..... </p> <p>Inside <acronym>W3C</acronym> there are working groups....</p> -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Seeman [mailto:lisa@ubaccess.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 9:56 AM To: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) Cc: john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu; Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Re: Words used in a restricted way (was RE: proposed new definitions for abbreviation and acronym) To be useful for the user I think it needs to be marked for every case Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote: >I agree. Some days ago i've posted a <dfn> example. >What about: "a word used in a restricted manner must be marked and >explained for only the first occurrence." ? This let to have both >acronym, abbr, dfn. > > >----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "John M Slatin"<john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu> > Inviato: 19/09/05 22.24.50 > A: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com"<Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>, "public-wcag-teamb@w3.org"<public-wcag-teamb@w3.org> > Oggetto: Words used in a restricted way (was RE: proposed new definitions for abbreviation and acronym) > Becky, then Roberto: > > <blockquote> > In addition we need to determine > if all instances of "a word used in a restricted manner" must be > marked or > only the first occurrence. > Thanks for your input. > > Roberto: > I think that we should mark all the occurrences and expand (with title > attributes) the first one. > </blockquote> > > Using the title attribute could be one sufficient technique for > providing definitions of words (other than abbreviations, acronyms, or > initialisms) used in a restricted way, but Team B has discussed other > techniques as well. Examples include using the <dfn> element, linking > to a definition in a glossary that's part of the same delivery unit, > using <link rel="glossary">, etc. > If we accept the proposal to combine GL 3.1 L3 SC2 (words used in a > restricted way) with GL 3.1 L3 SC3 (abbreviations), then (as Becky > pointed out last week) the Guide for the combined SC will need > techniques for *both* words used in a restricted way (such as the usage > of "text" in WCAG 2.0) *and* techniques for abbreviations, acronyms, and > initialisms. Of course, the techniques for identifying abbreviations, > acronyms, and initialisms will be pretty simple if we're going to > recommend <abbr> for all three<grin>. > > John > "Good design is accessible design." > > Dr. John M. Slatin, Director > Accessibility Institute > University of Texas at Austin > FAC 248C > 1 University Station G9600 > Austin, TX 78712 > ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 > email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu > Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano > (IWA/HWG) > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 1:44 PM > To: Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > Subject: RE: proposed new definitions for abbreviation and acronym > > > > > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com"<Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com> > Inviato: 19/09/05 20.37.05 > A: "public-wcag-teamb@w3.org"<public-wcag-teamb@w3.org> > Oggetto: RE: proposed new definitions for abbreviation and acronym > In addition we need to determine > if all instances of "a word used in a restricted manner" must be > marked or > > > >[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per >recuperare la restante parte.] > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 07:22:46 UTC