- From: <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:59:23 -0400
- To: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
- Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org, public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org
Yvette wrote:
I think the middle sentence implies that there is some causal relationship
between the occurrence of the named anchor and the use of the abbr element
directly after it. Wouldn't it be clearer to leave the named anchor out so
the example isn't more complex than necessary?
I was trying to address the issue of entering a document in the middle via
a link and still getting the benefit of the abbreviation expansion. This
is my alternative to requiring use of the <abbr> and <acronym> elements on
every occurrence. Perhaps this needs a more detailed explanation or should
I just leave it out and require that only the first occurrence in the
delivery unit be marked?
-becky
Becky Gibson
Web Accessibility Architect
IBM Emerging Internet Technologies
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101
Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 16:59:57 UTC