- From: Stottlemyer, Diane L. <Diane.Stottlemyer@drs.virginia.gov>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:38:44 -0400
- To: "Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
I think this is an important point for xml- "Specifiying a "lang"/"xml:lang" attribute is an easy and sufficient way to declare the language of a document." ________________________________ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org on behalf of Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 9:35 AM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Re: Additional thoughts on language specification Agree with Jens. ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Jens Meiert"<jens.meiert@erde3.com> Inviato: 12/09/05 14.49.13 A: "public-wcag-teamb@w3.org"<public-wcag-teamb@w3.org> Oggetto: Re: Additional thoughts on language specification > I think to pass this success criterion, each of the following > techniques is in itself sufficient: specifying the language in HTTP > headers or using the meta technique or lang-attribute of the HTML > element or the xml:lang-attribute of the HTML element. Exactly. > We could recommend specifying the language in the http headers (either > by manipulating the HTTP headers directly or by using the meta > technique) combined with the lang + xml:lang attributes of the HTML > element. Since the former techniques all are sufficient, I disagree. From my point of view, we should recommend the use of "lang"/"xml:lang" attributes alone. The problem with HTTP headers is that this information is not available in local copies, and the combination of HTTP headers and "lang" attributes bears the risk of contradictory declarations (where HTTP headers win). Specifiying a "lang"/"xml:lang" attribute is an easy and sufficient way to declare the language of a document. -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/ http://uitest.com/ < Reloaded [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.] * Confidentiality/Privacy Notice - The documents included in this transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the information to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately to arrange for return or destruction of these documents.
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 13:39:43 UTC