- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:22:09 -0500
- To: "Yvette Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
I like this proposal! John "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yvette Hoitink Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:15 PM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: RE: GL 3.1 L3 SC4 (Section titles) Loretta wrote: > While I'm always for proposals that reduce the number of > success criteria, I worry that if we only require titles and > heading to be descriptive, we never require that there be > titles at all. > > However, I do like combining the two requirements for being > descriptive. > What about deleting GL 3.1 L3 SC4, and splitting GL 2.4 L2 > SC3 into two success criteria: > <proposal> > GL 2.4 L2 SC3a: Delivery units have titles. > > GL 2.4 L2 SC3b: Titles and headings are descriptive. </proposal> Your message just crossed mine proposing the exact same thing. Great minds think alike :-) Yvette Hoitink Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl WWW: http://www.heritas.nl
Received on Monday, 10 October 2005 19:22:39 UTC