- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:49:38 -0600
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005d01c64555$bcc2fd70$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
There is a survey open til Monday night. There will probably be another as well later this weekend. These are a part of our new two pass system. See if we can hit a home run on the issues early in week - and where we miss, see if we can address issues and resurvey in time for the meeting. Please note that in filling out a survey - *if you want to keep an issue OPEN* that has *anything to do with the guidelines* - you need to *say exactly what you want to have done this week to close the issue*. We can't have any non-editorial issues left open. If you think we have a show-stopper issue (and any issue that affects success criteria, glossary, or conformance is a show-stopper) then we need to specify exactly what needs to be done to close it. Comments like "language is too technical" look like they should be left open. But if we don't have any plan to change it then we need to close it and say we've done the best we can. If we DO intend to change the language then we need concrete proposals as to what we are going to change this week. Ditto with other open ended issues. A comment like "need more examples" is fine to leave open. We have specifically not pushed that area - and it is non-normative so can be added as we go along. Thanks. Gregg & John
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2006 21:50:20 UTC