What we need to do next

Congratulations Team

 

Last week we had a record number of items and a record number that were
accepted without edit.  

 

Thanks all for putting in your 3 cents worth.

 

For this week 

 

1)       we have some left over we didn't get to last week.  They are in
proposals.  Look at em and post comments or suggested improvements



2)       Now that we have run out of NON-HOLD items -we begin to work on
hold items. 

 

EVERYONE 

Please look at the ATEAM hold list below. 

Pick an item that 

-          doesn't have too many pieces (unless you are a masochist)

-          is in an area you like

-          isnt also on another teams SORT name list. 

then write up a summary of what the postings are 

and IF YOU CAN a recommendation(s) for addressing them all.

 

IF you can't address them all - address what you can and we can discuss the
rest of the issues. 

 

IF YOU CAN'T ADDRESS ANY of them - that is OK TOO.  Just providing a good
summary of the all the comments in a group is Great. 

 

When doing the summary use the following form.

 

1)       short synopsis of the situation (e.g. 8 comment that sort into 3
issues  blah blah ) 

a.       about 1-3 sentences

2)       Short forms of each of the issues stating what the problem is and
what is suggested

3)       Any recommendations or thoughts that you have

4)       At the bottom of analysis - past THE FULL COMMENTS - ALL OF THEM. 

 

JUST TAKE ONE and work on it if you can.

 

REMEMBER - you DON'T HAVE TO SOLVE IT - just summarize it. 

 

Thanks much.


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
<http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9>  

  _____  

From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:27 PM
To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org;
public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Subject: ITEMS ON HOLD AND SORT NAMES - BY GROUP

 

Was looking through the hold items for group A and though I would summarize
for all groups.

 

Here are the SORT NAMES for each group along with the counts.

 

You can see we have SOME overlap   we should look at these and collaborate
when we get to processing the HOLD items.

 

For now  - keep working on your unsorted items to either CLOSE them or SORT
them into SORT NAME.  

Then we can work on the sorted items in groups. 

 

The good news..   Many of the sorted items get closed in clumps.   -  when
we get to them.

 


Gregg

 

TEAM A SORT NAMES

1  -  1.2.3    need AD always?   

23 -  4.1.1  use for comments dealing with, 'validity' 'parsed
unambiguously' 'use according to spec' etc

3  -  Aggregate

6  -  Audio description

1  -  Captions and Audio Description

47 -  Baseline  or baseline related (+4 resolved)

2  -  CLARIFICATION   

2  -  Cognitive    [1 exception for video descriptions and 1 conformance
claim]

23 -  Conformance   

8  -  Contrast   

3  -  Font

1  -  Free??  Player? 

8  -  Level AAA

9  -  change level

11 -  Levels  (mostly definition?]

 

 

TEAM B SORT NAMES 

 

1  - CLARIFICATION  

3  - 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 B  

3  - alternate versions B  

1  - AT Push  

2  - Baseline  

6  - change of context 

9  - cognitive

3  - descriptive titles 

12 - Link Text  

1  not in baseline 

7  - web unit 

 

TEAM C SORT NAMES

 

2  -  CLARIFICATION

4  - 2.2.1

3  - AT Push

2  - cognitive

7  - color/variations/programatically determined [5 +1 color..] - making
color or variations in presentation of text programatically 

2  - levels

 

EDITORZ SORT NAMES

 

4  - CLARIFICATION

3  - assistive technology

2  - authored units

5  - baseline

7  - cognitive

5  - definition

11  - introduction

8  - mapping

2  - meta

5  - programmatically determined 

18  - reorganize

16  - simpler

2  - testability  

9  - web unit