- From: Li, Alex <alex.li@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:58:49 -0800
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6D259B2A9E733043B2D8567C82C2FEF91D47C6AF@uspalx23.pal.sap.corp>
Hi all, I grouped the open issues into the four groups. This should help us figure out which one to watch out for as we work on 1.2 techniques. Open issues with no effect on techniques <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1601> 1601 suggests to move L2 SC to L1. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1602> 1602 suggests to move L1 SC to L2. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1704> 1704 suggests to move L1 SC to L2. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1730> 1730 suggests to keep caption at L1. May consider closing this. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1731> 1731 suggests to keep audio description at L1. May consider closing this. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1754> 1754 suggests to move captions from L1 to L2. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1803> 1803 suggests that captions are more important than audio description. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1850> 1850 suggests to move 1.2.3 to L1. No effect on techniques. Open issues unlikely to have effect on techniques <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1152> 1152 asks for exception or phase-in for multimedia. Not likely to lead to change in SC. Unlikely to have effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1816> 1816 says, "We want you to keep 1.2.2 to "Audio descriptions of video are provided for pre-recorded multimedia". Then it is possible to listen to the text, either the whole or just the one about what is happening, that is provided in 1.2.1 perhaps in another language than the original. The discussed change in the editorial note does not make it easier to get what is needed." I'm a bit confused about this one. But this does not appear to affect techniques work. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1824> 1824 says. "I think it is a good idea to change to this version as it should encourage at least a minimal level of accessibility vs. people not trying at all. Same for 1.2.2". Don't understand why this is still an open issue. No effect on techniques. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1862> 1862 suggests to expand the term multimedia from audio and video to tactile and other sensories. Availability of such technology is very limited today. Should not affect techniques work. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1370> 1370 is incomprehensible. Clarification needed. No effect on techniques for the time being. Open issues that can be closed via techniques <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1534> 1534 suggests to use Stevie Wonder's site as example for providing lyrics. Some concern over using copyrighted material. Techniques work should remove this issue. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1603> 1603 suggests techniques to create caption for real time material is identical to that of pre-recorded material. Techniques work should remove this issue. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1604> 1604 refers to use of upper case for caption of tutorial. Techniques work may remvoe this issue. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1627> 1627 suggests sc 1.2.4 was written with assumption of "universal sign language". Techniques doc or modification of how to meet doc should remove this issue. Open issues that may have some effect on techniques upon resolution <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1729> 1729 suggests to add text transcript at L1 because caption may be too small and insufficient. May add more technique if wg decide to add to sc. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1732> 1732 suggests to change wording of "who benefit". "Who Benefits from Guideline 1.2: Both sentences should include " and transcripts" at the end. Otherwise the benefits of transcripts are not made clear." May affect techniques and how to meet doc. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1765> 1765 debates that text transcript should be an option. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1815> 1815 suggests that 1.2.1 should provide collated transcript. Similar to <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1765> 1765. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1841> 1841 suggest to remove the term multimedia as it is too vague. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. Alex Li Manager, Accessibility Standards and Policies SAP Labs, Inc. 3410 Hillview Ave Palo Alto, CA 94304 T (650) 687-4770 F (610) 492-2961 M (202) 492-4592 mailto: <mailto:alex.li@sap.com> alex.li@sap.com http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/> THE BEST-RUN BUSINESSES RUN SAP This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:04:47 UTC