- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:45:57 -0500
- To: "'Christophe Strobbe'" <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
So you are suggesting that we REMOVE the failure? (did we accept this one at a meeting?) Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christophe Strobbe Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:32 AM To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org Subject: RE: Failure due to generating markup using document.write() or ... At 18:09 24/04/2006, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >Hi Christophe > >I'm not sure I understand your email > >1) What action are you recommending? At the moment, it looks like we need to drop this failure. >2) What does " But the current failure has not been accepted, eventually." >mean? Acceptance depended on whether we could find accessible and inaccessible ways of using document.write(). The way the title is phrased suggests that using document.write() is a problem in general (unparsed content), but it turns out that it may only be a problem if you use it to generate content that fails the guidelines (e.g. ambiguous document structure). We could have a "Failure due to using document.write() or document.writeln() to generate an ambiguous document structure", but that would be just a reiteration of SC 4.1.1 with the addition of JavaScript. Regards, Christophe >Thanks > >Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. >Director - Trace R & D Center >University of Wisconsin-Madison >The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b > >-----Original Message----- >From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christophe >Strobbe >Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:48 AM >To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org >Subject: Failure due to generating markup using document.write() or ... > > > >In 4.1.2 we have a "Failure due to generating markup using >document.write() or document.writeln() to write unparsed content" >(previous name: "Failure due to generating markup using methods for writing unparsed content"). >Apparently, document.write() does not cause problems as long as the >html that is inserted is well-formed and semantically correct. There >are problems when you use client-side script to generate HTML that >doesn't meet the guidelines in some way, or modifying good HTML code in >a way so that it no longer meets the guidelines. This is very general, >unless you create one such (scripting) failure for every success criterion where it is applicable. >But the current failure has not been accepted, eventually. > >Regards, > >Christophe > > >-- >Christophe Strobbe >K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on >Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - >BELGIUM >tel: +32 16 32 85 51 >http://www.docarch.be/ > > >Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 16:46:11 UTC