- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:27:22 -0400
- To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Gez Lemon'" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
Hi all I have completed my action items 2.2 L1 SC1, 3.2 L2 SC3, 1.1 L1 SC3, and am ready to consider them as proposals to the larger group. http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_2.2_L1_SC1#Techniqu es_for_addressing_2.2_L1_SC1 http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L2_SC3 http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_1.1_L1_SC3 .Access empowers people .barriers disable them. www.eramp.com -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 6:05 AM To: 'Gez Lemon' Cc: public-wcag-teama@w3.org Subject: RE: Action Item Bug: 1568 Thanks Gez I looked and I think the third bullet under "intent" makes the difference clear in an interesting way that keeps us from needing to define it or state specifically that they are different. It does it by putting them side by side in context. Very clever. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 4:27 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Cc: public-wcag-teama@w3.org Subject: Re: Action Item Bug: 1568 Hi Gregg, > At the last WG meeting the WG decided to not define FOCUS because it > actually has different meanings in different places. Also, people > know what it means that can do something about this. > > It was felt that there was a problem with people reading fast and mistaking > "receives focus" with focus. So in the Guide doc we can just put a note to > clarify this and it would be more effective than two definitions that > the user would have to decipher and integrate to get the same conclusion. > > Make sense to you? If not give me a buzz. Yes, that all makes sense. Is the guide doc as it stands [1] clear about the difference between "focus" and "receives focus", or will this need adding before it goes to survey with the main group? [1] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guide_to_3.2_L1_SC1 Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:27:39 UTC