RE: Action Item Bug: 1568

Yes
   It would go into our draft and then on to Vote if our group agrees..
 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:26 AM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: Christophe Strobbe; public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: Re: Action Item Bug: 1568


On 05/10/05, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Ok
>
> How about
>
> When any component, including the delivery unit as a whole, receives 
> focus, a change of context is not triggered.

I like this wording, as it's concise, and doesn't suggest that the component
that received focus must be responsible for causing the change of context.
Not mentioning losing focus also ensures there's no confusion about whether
navigating from one page to another is a violation of this success
criterion.

Should this go to a vote?

Best regards,

Gez

--
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:54:44 UTC