- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:54:34 -0500
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
Yes It would go into our draft and then on to Vote if our group agrees.. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:26 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Cc: Christophe Strobbe; public-wcag-teama@w3.org Subject: Re: Action Item Bug: 1568 On 05/10/05, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > Ok > > How about > > When any component, including the delivery unit as a whole, receives > focus, a change of context is not triggered. I like this wording, as it's concise, and doesn't suggest that the component that received focus must be responsible for causing the change of context. Not mentioning losing focus also ensures there's no confusion about whether navigating from one page to another is a violation of this success criterion. Should this go to a vote? Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 16:54:44 UTC