- From: Wayne Dick via WBS Mailer <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:18:01 +0000
- To: wayneedick@gmail.com,public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org,shadi@w3.org,e.velleman@accessibility.nl
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for publication of WCAG-EM 1.0 as a W3C Working Group Note' (public) for Wayne Dick. > > --------------------------------- > Abstract > ---- > > > * (x) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Very clear. No changes required. > > > --------------------------------- > Introduction > ---- > > > * (x) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) 1. The list of "required" reading is somewhat daunting. Reading the Techniques end to end is counter recommendation, but that appears to be the suggestion. 2. The glossary is spectacular. That collection of definitions alone is worth reading the document! > > > --------------------------------- > Using This Methodology > ---- > > > * (x) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) No change. > > > --------------------------------- > Scope of Applicability > ---- > > > * (x) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) The Principle of Website Enclosure is Especially Clear. The entire section gives a clear framework for determining scope. Question: Does the referenced example site exist? > > > --------------------------------- > Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope > ---- > > > * (x) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Good and Clear > > > --------------------------------- > Step 2: Explore the Target Website > ---- > > > * ( ) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) More examples of essential functionality may be needed like "application for services from an agency." Explicit reference of Dojo or JQuery may be vendor biased. Perhaps use categories like polyfills or Widget Libraries. > > > --------------------------------- > Step 3: Select a Representative Sample > ---- > > > * ( ) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) > > > --------------------------------- > Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample > ---- > > > * ( ) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) > > > --------------------------------- > Step 5: Report the Evaluation Findings > ---- > > > * ( ) accept this section * ( ) accept this section with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section for the following reasons * ( ) I abstain (not vote) > > > --------------------------------- > Remaing Comments > ---- > Provide any remaining comments that you may have. > > Comments: > > These answers were last modified on 27 June 2014 at 12:16:56 U.T.C. > by Wayne Dick > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20140623/ until 2014-06-30. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 12:18:03 UTC