- From: suzette keith <suzette.skeith@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:43:10 +0000
- To: public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAH7X45Nhw-FoNUJCZog4ZcHjJo04yvpJLGMC31P6WOB98RqhVg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear WCAG EM I have read through WCAG EM and congratulate you on its progress. On a small point of language I noticed as outbreak of the word 'per' - especially in section 5, which I would suggest could inhibit ease of understanding and is also unnecessary. I would propose removing all 'per' and using a plain language alternative, if necessary. FYI: I researched the opinions of others via Google, and here is one of the more interesting discussions on the use of per and as per: http://www.businesswritingblog.com/business_writing/2009/05/your-help-please-with-as-per.html Per and 'as per' is a pseudo-latin construction. Opinions appear to divide between clarity, efficiency, and improper use. There are however alternatives which are more natural. The only examples that fit well in my head are: taking medicine 'per day', or sharing pencils 'one per child' and 'per your instructions. The use of 'Per website' and 'per web page' (WCAG EM methodological requirement 5c) seem particularly puzzling and drove me to Google to find out why. Best wishes > > Suzette > > -- Suzette Keith Usability and Accessibility Consultant: requirements gathering and evaluation Digital Unite licenced tutor: getting started with email, shopping and travel.
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:59:53 UTC