- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:31:22 +0100
- To: ACT Rules CG <public-act-r@w3.org>, Accessibility Conformance Testing <public-wcag-act@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGOZyanz-nrKYivmzKGG8WSKwe0aE1AJCgvtt639hDG2VA@mail.gmail.com>
Oops! I meant to say Thursday, not Wednesday. Sorry folks. On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:17 PM Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > Just a quick reminder about Wednesday's joint CG / TF meeting. See the > e-mail below for details. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 4:55 PM Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> We want to invite you all to a joint meeting between the ACT Task Force, >> and the ACT-Rules community group, to talk about how to handle state >> testing for rules. This meeting will be on January 21st, 15:00 CEST. >> >> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ACT-TF&iso=20210121T15&p1=16&ah=1 >> >> IRC: http://irc.w3.org?channels=#wcag-act (port: 6665 channel #wcag-act) >> Zoom: https://mit.zoom.us/j/234301406 (ask the password in IRC) >> >> Agenda: >> - Introduction on state >> - Examples of state in rules today >> - Discussion on how use state in rules going forward >> >> >> To briefly introduce the question; It is currently unclear whether sate >> updating should be considered part of page exploration or if it should be >> included in the test procedure itself. Some examples of it would be that >> while activating different tabs and testing the content of each tab one at >> a time is generally considered to be part of an exploratory step that is >> done before testing. But it is fairly common when testing the contrast of a >> link, to include testing the default, hover, and focus state in the test >> procedure. >> >> Where this matters for ACT is in the scope of a rule. Should rules be >> written so they are applicable to different states, or do we limit rules to >> testing just the current state. In either scenario, do we want to account >> for state in the applicability and expectations, or do we need some other >> way to account for state in ACT rules? >> >> >> I hope you'll all be able to attend. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> -- >> *Wilco Fiers* >> Axe-core product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R >> >> >> Join me at axe-con <http://deque.com/axe-con> 2021: a free digital >> accessibility conference. >> > > > -- > *Wilco Fiers* > Axe-core product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R > > > Join me at axe-con <http://deque.com/axe-con> 2021: a free digital > accessibility conference. > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R Join me at axe-con <http://deque.com/axe-con> 2021: a free digital accessibility conference.
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Monday, 18 January 2021 15:31:48 UTC