Hey Frederick,
Thanks for sharing. I think these are great resources. ACT rules
essentially are test assertions with a few bits added to it we found useful
for accessibility. I don't think the outcomes themselves need to be test
assertions, but having test assertions for each outcome would be very
useful I think.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:00 AM Frederick Boland <frederickboland@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Perhaps the use of test assertions could help clarify the outcomes. See:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#write-assertion-gp
> and https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=tag
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 1, 2021, 10:19:57 AM EDT, Wilco Fiers <
> wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Here are the minutes to today's joint ACT & Silver meeting:
> https://www.w3.org/2021/04/01-wcag-act-minutes.html
>
> In summary, the group discussed where the ACT work might be able to fit
> in. Shadi brought up that WCAG 3 outcomes could be better defined in
> various ways. Anne Thyme Nørregaard suggested to see the ACT Rules Format
> as requirements needed by testers to be able to test consistently. Wilco
> Fiers mentioned that there is quite some overlap between ACT rules and WCAG
> 3 methods, and that figuring out a way to blend the two could be a good
> starting point for a joint effort.
>
> Jeanne Spellman suggested to have a longer follow-up meeting to take one
> of the guidelines and work out in detail what improvements ACT would
> recommend be made to it. The ACT and Silver chairs will follow up to plan
> such a meeting.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> *Wilco Fiers*
> Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
>
>
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
