- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:24:36 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Cc: Alistair Garrison <alistair.garrison@ssbbartgroup.com>, Accessibility Conformance Testing <public-wcag-act@w3.org>
Hi all, The full set of test cases is available (in 3 versions) in GitHub (Apache license): - https://github.com/webcc/bentoweb-wcag20-test-suite-v1 - https://github.com/webcc/bentoweb-wcag20-test-suite-v2 - https://github.com/webcc/bentoweb-wcag20-test-suite-v3 See also: <http://bentoweb.org/tools.html> On 10/04/17 17:07, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi all, > > In 2006 the (now closed) Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT > WG) worked on a "WCAG 2.0 Test Samples Repository": > - https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/ > > These were contributed by the EC-funded BenToWeb project, which also > developed a comprehensive Test Case Description Language (TCDL). These > Test Samples use a sub-set of the TCDL metadata (documented at the URL > above). We never fully migrated all the Test Samples from the project, > but I'm sure Fraunhofer would be interested in making them available. > > Here is the BenToWeb site for more information: > - http://www.bentoweb.org/ > > Best, > Shadi > > > On 05-Apr-17 10:59, Wilco Fiers wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> After Monday's discussion I had some ideas on how to proceed with our >> test >> case repository. We've put together a decent size collection of test >> cases >> at this point. But right now they can't be processed automatically >> yet. So >> the question is how do we get to that point. >> >> It seems to me that it would be best if we could let each of these test >> case repos be what they are today. I think we should probably avoid >> forking >> them all and putting them into a new place. That will be way too much >> effort to maintain. So what we could potentially do instead, is that for >> each of these we build a metadata file, that follows a predefined >> structure, so that ATTs can run against those metadata files and run the >> test cases that way. Here's what I'm thinking (written in JSON): >> >> { >> "name": "axe-core", >> "version": "2.1.7", >> "license": "MPL-2.0", >> "a11y-testcases": [{ >> "url": " >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dequelabs/axe-core/master/test/integration/rules/image-alt/image-alt.html >> >> ", >> "successCriteria": ["wcag20:text-equiv-all"] >> "failed": ["#violation1", "#violation2", "#violation3", >> "#violation4"], >> "passed": ["#pass1", "#pass2", "#pass3", "#pass4", "#pass5", >> "#pass6"] >> }, { >> ... >> }] >> } >> >> Thoughts? >> >> W >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Sorry Alistair for not replying. I missed that part of the email. Upon >>> first reading it I went and added in some links into the wiki page and >>> didn't send an email figuring you were following the page and would get >>> notifications of updates. Obviously, we have access to IBM rules that >>> are >>> not open-source and will share knowledge, if not directly the test >>> cases so >>> did not add them to the list. I am searching the internet for other >>> potential candidates and will add what I find there as well. >>> >>> As for the other email regarding the test case template to follow, I >>> like >>> the 5 parts of the template (copied below so folks don't have to link >>> over >>> to your other email). >>> >>> 1) Code snippet – element; group of elements; full html element >>> contents; >>> 2) Provided by (organisation) >>> 3) From the test suite of which tool >>> 4) Expected outcome – is conforming content; is not conforming >>> content (number of expected issues) >>> 5) Related WCAG Success Criteria >>> >>> >>> Wondering if we would need the following in the template: >>> >>> - Title or short name for the test case >>> - an optional "Notes" section where any known accessibility support >>> limitations, or any other explanations of the test case would be >>> documented. >>> - Related WCAG implementation technique (if it is an example of one) >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Mary Jo >>> ------------------------------ >>> <http://www.ibm.com/able> >>> *Mary Jo Mueller* >>> Accessibility Standards Program Manager >>> IBM Accessibility, IBM Research, Austin, TX >>> Phone: 512-286-9698 <(512)%20286-9698> | Tie-line: 363-9698 >>> *Search for accessibility answers* <http://ibm.biz/a11y-search> >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/e/vgh/2419815/eml-grp-sub/> >>> <http://www.facebook.com/IBMAccessibility> >>> <http://twitter.com/IBMAccess> >>> "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and >>> become more, you are a leader." >>> *~John Quincy Adams* >>> >>> [image: Inactive hide details for Alistair Garrison ---03/22/2017 >>> 10:35:45 >>> AM---Dear all, I’m in the process of adding a section on “]Alistair >>> Garrison ---03/22/2017 10:35:45 AM---Dear all, I’m in the process of >>> adding >>> a section on “Test Case Repositories for WCAG 2.0” to the Tes >>> >>> From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.garrison@ssbbartgroup.com> >>> To: Accessibility Conformance Testing <public-wcag-act@w3.org> >>> Date: 03/22/2017 10:35 AM >>> Subject: Pooling test case repositories on the wiki >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I’m in the process of adding a section on “Test Case Repositories for >>> WCAG >>> 2.0” to the Testing Resources Wiki ( >>> *https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/wiki/Testing_Resources* >>> >>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/wiki/Testing_Resources> >>> >>> ). >>> >>> The repositories to be listed in this section will contain examples of >>> what constitutes conformance / non-conformance with WCAG 2.0 SCs, in >>> terms >>> of concrete HTML snippet examples. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> 1) >>> >>> *https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core/tree/master/test/integration/full* >>> >>> >>> <https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core/tree/master/test/integration/full> >>> >>> 2) *https://github.com/IBMa/Va11yS* >>> <https://github.com/IBMa/Va11yS> >>> >>> >>> Please email me if you have access to, or know of, any further >>> publically >>> available Test Case Repositories? The more repos the merrier! >>> >>> FYI – Here is a link from my previous email relating to Test Case >>> Repositories - >>> *http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-act/2017Feb/0007.html* >>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-act/2017Feb/0007.html> >>> >>> Very best regards >>> >>> Alistair >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Alistair Garrison >>> Director of Accessibility Research >>> Level-Access (formerly SSB Bart Group) >>> Visit us online: *Website* <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/> | *Twitter* >>> <https://twitter.com/SSBBARTGroup> | *Facebook* >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ssbbartgroup> | *LinkedIn* >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> | *Blog* >>> <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Best Regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Saludos, carlos Dr Carlos A Velasco Web Compliance Center Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) https://imergo.com/ · http://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 09:25:32 UTC