[important] group input on Easy-to-Read symposium

Dear Group and E2R symposium co-chairs,

In lieu of this week's meeting I'd like to get your input via mail.

#1. Please review the updated symposium page and let us know any 
thoughts you may have -- the symposium co-chairs are working on the 
agenda section but otherwise it should be ready:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2012/easy-to-read/>


#2. Please share your thoughts on teleconferencing system -- The setup 
for TC4R worked quite well but it is limited to ~50 participants (we had 
40+ participants). There are benefits to allow more participants but 
also drawbacks (more noise and chatter, less focused discussion, more 
overhead to manage, ...), most importantly, the other system we tried 
didn't have the same level of quality -- we need to decide!


#3. Some of the listed papers have character-encoding bugs that crept in 
during the QA process (how ironic!) -- any volunteers to help clean up 
the HTML in some of these papers?


#4. Please share any other thoughts about potential questions to raise, 
discussion to have, or other suggestions you may have for the co-chairs 
to consider for the symposium -- they are preparing now.

Thanks,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 08:02:45 UTC