- From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:16:37 +0000
- To: Klaus Miesenberger <Klaus.Miesenberger@jku.at>
- CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi Klaus, we did panel sessions with questions for the Mobile - but it was still took ages... Si. PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line. ======================= Simon Harper http://simon.harper.name/about/card/ University of Manchester (UK) Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk On 02/11/2012 11:04, Klaus Miesenberger wrote: > > Good to hear from you Simon - hope you are well back! > > > This is also my concern. My understanding was that we do not run a > traditional presentation of papers but a discussion with the panel of > authors. > > Participant har read the papers and we do not ask for presentation. > > > If we ask for presentaitons, I would also opt for 2 symposia (e.g. a > week inbetween. > > > In the last telco my understanding was that we should go away from > presenting papers but making it more disussion based. > > > Klaus > > > a.Univ.Prof.Dr. Klaus Miesenberger > University of Linz, Institut Integriert Studieren > Altenbergerstrasse 69, A-4040 Linz > klaus.miesenberger@jku.at, http://www.integriert-studieren.jku.at/ > Tel: +43-732-2468-9232 Fax: ...-9322 > > International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special > Needs, ICCHP: http://www.icchp.org > International Camps on Computers&Communication, ICC: > http://www.icc-camp.info/ > Association for the Advancement for Assistive Technology in Europe, > AAATE: www.aaate.net <http://www.aaate.net> > eAccess+ The eAccessibility newtork: www.eaccessplus.eu > <http://www.eaccessplus.eu> > Austrian Computer Society, OCG: www.ocg.at/ <http://www.ocg.at/> > > > > >>> Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk> 2.11.2012 11:13 AM >>> > Hi Klaus, > > this is really great news - I agree wrt 1 and 2 - my worry is that we > won't be able to run through all papers in the time we have available. I > wonder if it is worth having 2 symposiums and 1 note? > > Si. > > > PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster > response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line. > > ======================= > Simon Harper > http://simon.harper.name/about/card/ > > University of Manchester (UK) > Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group > http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk > > On 02/11/2012 08:50, Klaus Miesenberger wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > unfortunatly Sandy blew away our telco this week - I do hope that > > Simon and others are not affected too much by this. > > > > Following our timeline we have to notify submitters about acceptance > > or decline of papers for the symposium - that's what I wanted to > > discuss on Wednesday. > > > > Here is a proposal, following a chair meeting we did in Linz, for both > > acceptance and symposium structure (numbers refer to the list attached) > > > > A) Acceptance our of 17 submissions > > 1) Clear accept for 11 papers: 8, 11, 2, 3, 9, 12, 13, 17, 4, 16, 10 > > 2) Tend to accept for 3 papers: 6, 5, 15 > > 3) Not accept for 3 papers: 1, 7, 14 > > > > Our suggestion is to accept 1) and 2) due to the following reasons: > > a) They all provide very valuable information on a new topic; pushing > > this field as a new research area merits to include a broad perspective > > b) It is hard to evaluate on basis of short abstracts. The difference > > in quality is not that high. > > c) And most important: Selecting these 14 papers would support a fine > > structuring of the symposium: > > > > B) Thematic Grouping of 14 papers: > > 1) Guidelines and WCAG update: 4,9,10 > > 2) Tools: 2,(5), (6), 12, 13, (15), 17 > > 3) Workflow, Process, Services: 3, 8, 11, 16 > > > > C) Programme > > INTRODUCTION (5 min) > > Panel A: Guidelines (25 min) > > - prepared questions to all panelists (15) > > - open questions (10) > > Panel B: Tools (60 min) > > - prepared question to all panelists (40) > > - open questions (20) > > Panel C: Workflow, Process, Services (30 min) > > - prepared questions to all panelists (20) > > - open questions (10) > > Follow up discussion for interested people > > Before sending out notifications I wanted to ask if the group could > > basically agree to this strucutre. I will inform all contributors that > > the notification will be delayed till Monday. Therefore I would need > > feedback till Monday noon next week. > > > > Many thanks > > Klaus > > > > > > > > a.Univ.Prof.Dr. Klaus Miesenberger > > University of Linz, Institut Integriert Studieren > > Altenbergerstrasse 69, A-4040 Linz > > klaus.miesenberger@jku.at > > <mailto:klaus.miesenberger@jku.at>, > http://www.integriert-studieren.jku.at/ > > > > Tel: +43-732-2468-3751 Fax: ...-23751 > > International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special > > Needs, ICCHP: http://www.icchp.org <http://www.icchp.org/> > > International Camps on Computers&Communication, ICC: > > http://www.icc-camp.info/ > > Association for the Advancement for Assistive Technology in Europe, > > AAATE: www.aaate.net <http://www.aaate.net/> > > eAccess+ The eAccessibility newtork: www.eaccessplus.eu > > <http://www.eaccessplus.eu/> > > Austrian Computer Society, OCG: www.ocg.at/ <http://www.ocg.at/> >
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 11:17:01 UTC