- From: Peter <peterdev001@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:56:45 +0100
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Yup, think we can work within that. +peter On 13 February 2012 19:07, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Seems fair enough. > > cheers > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:30:39 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > >> Dear Group, >> >> As per my action item to review the seminar planning timeline [1], I >> propose the following new timeline: >> >> * -15 weeks - select topic, editors, and planning committee >> * -14 weeks - announce pre-notification of call for papers >> * -12 weeks - announce call for papers and scientific committee >> * -8 weeks - deadline for paper submissions >> * -6 weeks - review feedback to paper authors and rebuttal >> * -4 weeks - deadline for final papers, announcement of program >> * -2 weeks - publication of accepted papers and registration opens >> * Day X - teleconference symposium >> * +2 weeks - draft teleconference proceedings for review >> * +4 weeks - announcement of teleconference proceedings >> >> [1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/planning#seminar> >> >> Best, >> Shadi >> >> > > > -- > Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > je parle franįais -- hablo espaņol -- jeg kan litt norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com >
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 21:57:13 UTC