- From: Luz Rello <luzrello@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:57:36 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Thank you Shawn for the links and the explanations. I would chose "people with other reading difficulties". However, Clayton would know better. Best regards, Luz On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: > Thank you for the comments, Luz! Replies below. > > On 8/15/2012 6:06 AM, Luz Rello wrote: >> Hello Shawn, hello RDWG, >> >> >> Please find below my comments about the CFP for tc4r: >> >> — Perhaps there is a reason to avoid including "Legibility" and prefer using >> only "Readability". If there is no expefific reason I would include include >> "Legibility" at least in the Introduction. >> >> "It encourages new research, as well as analysis of past broader research, >> to further understand issues around text customization for legibility and readability" > > For this symposium, we want to focus on readability beyond legibility. Some perspective is in <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Text_Customization#Readability_Beyond_Legibility> > > >> — In Scope and Related Topics: >> >> Maybe I did not understand it properly, but I don't know why >> "optimum font" is out of scope. Is it not part to text customization? > > We are working from the position is that there is no optimum font that will work for most users. In fact, without customization, one user’s needs can conflict with another user’s needs -- e.g., for contrast. More perspective is in <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Text_Customization#The_Need_for_Text_Customisation> > >> — In User Group: >> >> people with dyslexia and related impairments> >> people with dyslexia and other reading difficulties or impairments. > > Is "other reading difficulties" sufficiently covered in the next bullet: > " > * people with dyslexia and related impairments, > * people with other conditions that impact reading, > " > Or maybe we should say: > " > * people with dyslexia and related impairments, > * people with other reading difficulties, > " > ? > > I'll reach out to Clayton Lewis for his input on this. Others I should ask? > > >> — In "We particularly welcome submissions that describe:" >> I miss the boldface in some of the words of the list, like it is being >> done in "Objectives", to highlight the kind of contributions which >> are welcome. > > I thought the same thing when drafting it. :) I've added bolding. > > Best, > ~Shawn > > >> >> >> Best regards, >> Luz >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: >> >>> [tc4r] = Text Customization for Readability Symposium >>> >>> Hi RDWG folks, >>> >>> The main page, CfP page, and CfP e-mail drafts are all updated at:<http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Text_Customization_Symposium_draft_page> >>> >>> Please make sure to refresh the page when you look at it, as we might have additional minor edits later today or tomorrow morning. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ~Shawn, Kath, Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 12:58:08 UTC