- From: giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>
- Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:19:06 +0200
- To: public-wai-rd@w3.org
Hi there. After a quick chat with Markel and Josh, I went ahead and slightly edited the cfp http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Draft_version_of_the_call_for_papers This is a summary: - bg section: I'd reword some sentences to clarify them (the example, for example; continual --> continuous) - objective: question 3 needs to be rephrased as it is the key validity question: any metric should be a good predictor of accessibility. I would also add reference to other guidelines besides w3c ones, like section 508, and remove reference to UAAG and ATAG; we're dealing with metrics that apply to web content only, not dev tools nor browsers. I would also promote the issue of "discuss approaches for validating, benchmarking, and comparing web accessibility metrics" to a bulletted question. Furthermore, in the objective, I would also add a sentence or two saying that this collected volume of papers will constitute the basis from which to further explore a research and dev roadmap for web acc metrics. - participation: we need to decide which criteria we will be using to evaluate and compare papers, and the reviewing process. The latter is easy (like 3 reviewers per paper, and a review form like those used in assets or similar conferences). The former could be based on criteria like relevance, clarity, soundness/power of arguments, generality of results/impact. We should write them down in the cfp. Giorgio On 08/30/2011 06:30 PM, Simon Harper wrote: > This weeks Teleconference will be your last chance to comment on the > Draft First Call > > - http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Draft_version_of_the_call_for_papers > > Cheers >
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 14:19:50 UTC