- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:12:06 +0200
- To: "Eval TF" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:04:27 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > Dear RDWG and Eval TF, > > Ref: > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Website_Accessibility_Evaluation_Methodologies> > > RDWG is collecting information about existing website accessibility > evaluation methodologies. This will help the development of a WCAG2 > evaluation methodology but also serve future research and development > activities. Please send information about existing methodologies with > 1-2 sentence description to public-wai-rd@w3.org or directly edit the > wiki page if you have access (RDWG participants). Hi, I have an unpublished paper by Jonathon O'Donnell et al, which looks at reviews of Australian websites (universities, banks, and some others) and talks about the topic. I have his permission to quote it (the bulk of it is valuable I think, but some of it we don't need), but wonder if I should put the content onto the wiki, or what... cheers Chaals -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:12:45 UTC