- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:35:04 +0200
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- CC: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Joshue, The initial objective was to collect publicly documented evaluation methodologies that we can learn from for the development of a WCAG2 methodology. I'm not sure how such generic information supports this purpose. What precisely do you suggest adding to the wiki? Thanks, Shadi On 21.10.2011 10:36, Joshue O Connor wrote: > Hi all, > > In terms of accessibility evaluation methodologies that are documented > (in terms of an articulated framework) - I will play devils advocate and > say that the kind of thing that Léonie is outlining is the lions share > of what people do. In CFIT, we do the same kind of thing as Nomensa - > with the addition of expert evaluation. The expert evaluation part is an > established methodology - so if that helps Shadi maybe you could add it? > > Cheers > > Josh > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 11:35:41 UTC