- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:41:27 +0200
- To: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>
- CC: "public-wai-rd@w3.org" <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Leonie, Is this methodology documented publicly? The idea is not to document organizations that carry out evaluations but rather existing, publicly documented methodologies to learn from. I will clarify the wiki page accordingly. Thanks, Shadi On 20.10.2011 12:26, Léonie Watson wrote: > Good morning, > > In response to Shadi's request for one/two sentence descriptions of accessibility evaluation methodologies: > > Nomensa manually evaluates a representative sample of pages against the full set of WCAG success criteria, and uses automated tools to evaluate a large sample of pages against a subset of WCAG success criteria. We also carry out an holistic evaluation of the site from the perspective of people with different disabilities/assistive technology requirements. > > Regards, > Léonie. > > -- > Nomensa - humanising technology > > Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility& Web Development > > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 > twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson > > Nomensa Email Disclaimer: http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer > > © Nomensa Ltd, King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 | Company number: 4214477 > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 12:42:03 UTC