Re: EvalTF agenda Telco

Regrets as I am travelling.

Kindest Regards,

Gavin Evans
Director of Operations | DAC
Mob: 07936 685804
Twitter: @GavinAEvans @DACcessibility
www.digitalaccessibilitycentre.org<http://www.digitalaccessibilitycentre.org/>
www.accessin.org<http://www.accessin.org/>

On 20 May 2014, at 12:45, "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl<mailto:evelleman@bartimeus.nl>> wrote:

Dear Eval TF,

The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 22 May 2014 at:
 * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
 * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
 * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
 * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
 * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
 * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
 * 00:00 to 01:00 Eastern Australia Time (Note: Friday)

Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
 - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>

The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
 * +1.617.761.6200
 * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP

We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
 * IRC server: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org>
 * port: 6665
 * channel: #eval


AGENDA:

#1. Welcome

#2. Open comments in DoC  that need discussion: ID 77
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20140130#comment77

#3. Open comments in DoC  that need discussion: ID 82
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20140130#comment82

#4. How have we decided what random is?
Question from last weeks telco (http://www.w3.org/2014/05/15-eval-minutes.html) We discussed comment 23 in our last telco: should we skew the sample towards frequently visited or used pages? We decided that this could be indicated for the structured sample, but is not meant for the random sample. The random sample has to be random.
- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20140130#comment23>
- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20140514#step3e>
Do we want to reopen that discussion?

#5. Open comments in DoC  that need discussion: ID 90
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20140130#comment 90

#6. Other issues