RE: Test-run WCAG-EM website

Don't forget we've still got the university section of Edith Cowan
University who agreed previously that we could use their website.

Regards,

Vivienne Conway, B.IT (Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(CS)
Director

Web Key IT Pty Ltd
PO BOX 681 Wanneroo, WA 6946
M    0415 383 673   F   (08) 9325 6422

E      v.conway@webkeyit.com
W    www.webkeyit.com 




This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the
named addressee. It is confidential and may be subject to legal professional
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact me
immediately by reply email, delete it from your system and destroy any
copies. This email is subject to copyright, no part of it should be
reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the
copyright owner. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Web Key IT
Pty Ltd.

-----Original Message-----
From: Detlev Fischer [mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de] 
Sent: Monday, 24 February 2014 4:45 PM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org; evelleman@bartimeus.nl
Subject: Re: Test-run WCAG-EM website

One option for a site for testing is
http://www.incobs.de/home.html

This is the English part of the web site, and one could constrain the test
to that.

The site should be fully WCAG 2.0 AA accessible (but we haven't tested it
ourselves) - also, it is a responsive site which apart from changing the CSS
does some reordering of the navigation dependent on media queries
breakpoints, si that might be interesting. It also has some dynamich
JavaScript stuff (accordions).

Best,
Detlev

--
Detlev Fischer
testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg

Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Velleman, Eric schrieb am 09.02.2014 15:44:

> Dear all,
> 
> We need nominations for a website to evaluate using WCAG-EM. Any
suggestions?
> My proposal would be to take a website that is not overly complex, but 
> that is open for discussion. We could use one of the three we used 
> earlier for the test-run in april last year. We will do the evaluation 
> in a closed survey tool so the results will not be visible on the 
> outside. However, it would be nicer if the website owner is ok with the
evaluation before you nominate a website.
> That would make it easier to discuss the results on the mailinglist.
> 
> For the website, we need to provide the following:
> 
> - Scope of the website:
> - Conformance target:
> - Accessibility support baseline:
> - Evaluation methods to be used (optional):
> - Additional evaluation requirements (optional):
> 
> Described in more detail in Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope 
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/#step1).
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
>

Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 11:09:08 UTC