RE: WCAG-EM testing proposal

Hi Detlev, all,

Also seems to me that doing step 1 - 3 is probably less time consuming. So let us start there. This means:

1. We need volunteers for this. Please indicate on the mailing list if you can help.
2. Please send me more proposals for potential websites (traditional website and/or web application). 

We could do this offline so the website is not named on the mailing list. Would be great if we could have at least six volunteers to do two different websites. 
Kindest regards,

Eric


________________________________________
Van: Detlev Fischer [detlev.fischer@testkreis.de]
Verzonden: zaterdag 16 maart 2013 10:41
Aan: v.conway@ecu.edu.au; Velleman, Eric; public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Onderwerp: Re: WCAG-EM testing proposal

Hi everyone,

I guess what really can be tested is step 1-3 to see if after following these steps we will come up with vert different samplings and if we do, analyse why thst happened. Acrually going through the success criteria in step 4 will just reveal the differences we will have in assessing content, letting minor issues pass (or not) as the case nay be, guided (or not) by the application of WCAG techniques. There is nothing in the methodology that would recommend any rating approach over any other.

Testing step 1-3 does not seem very timeconsuming so I am happy to join the test team.

Regards,
Detlev

--
Detlev Fischer
testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg

Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites



----- Original Message -----
From: v.conway@ecu.edu.au
To: evelleman@bartimeus.nl, public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Date: 16.03.2013 06:35:32
Subject: WCAG-EM testing proposal


> Hi Eric
>
> This is looking good, but certainly seems like a lot of work for individual volunteers who would all be assessing the same pages.  While it will give a great data set, to evaluate a website usually takes considerable time and this would also depend upon the sample size.  Would it be better to split up the sample after it is chosen in step 3 and all evaluate a portion?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(cs)
> PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
> Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
> v.conway@ecu.edu.au
> v.conway@webkeyit.com
> Mob: 0415 383 673
>
> This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
> ________________________________________
> From: Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 8:36 PM
> To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
> Subject: EvalTF No telco but list discussion
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please let me hear what you think of the proposal to form teams and test-drive WCAG-EM?
> Mail with proposal is at:
>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2013Mar/0009.html>
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Eric
>
> =========================
> Eric Velleman
> Technisch directeur
> Stichting Accessibility
> Universiteit Twente
>
> Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270
>
> Christiaan Krammlaan 2
> 3571 AX Utrecht
>
> www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu /
> www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu
>
> Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer
> Accessibility is Member van het W3C
> =========================
>
> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.
>
> CRICOS IPC 00279B
>

Received on Sunday, 17 March 2013 18:20:35 UTC