- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
- To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Hi, Here are my suggestions to include in the Disposition of Comments: (1) Step 1.b: Define the Goal of the Evaluation Proposal to change the Report types here to follow use cases. Certainly relevant would be: A. Legacy site evaluation (old site known not to conform) B. Development support evaluation (new accessible site under development) C. Conformance evaluation (site that has been designed to conform or where a conformance claim has been made by the site owner) (2) Step 3: Select a Representative Sample Add advice on how to specify dynamic states of pages (fold-out sections, lightboxes etc). We need to discuss whether these states should basicaly form additional pages (i.e. base URL plus documented action) or whether we propose a format where pages in the sample can be given a number of enumerated states (3) The same applies to or sequential processes starting on pages (say a search might be described by - base URL - text input for searcvh followed by submission - evaluation of generated page Generated pages often cannot be specified as separate URL, they often need to be speified by describing the process strarting fropm some base URL -- Detlev Fischer testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84 Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3 Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 http://www.testkreis.de Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 14:49:11 UTC