- From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:07:45 +0000
- To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear all, Things we may want to discuss as input for the next editor draft from reactions in the survey 7 [1]: 2. ..otherwise we must define "random" Frederick was so kind to include a few definitions into the survey but I am not sure if we really have to include a definition or explanation of 'random'. There are many ways to select a random sample and I am not sure if we want to put one or more of them into the methodology as it would seem we have a preference. Part of a possible resolution: No definition or explanation, but we add to the reporting section: "describe how you selected the random sample." Let me know what you think. Kindest regards, Eric [1] - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130122#step3e>
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 00:14:28 UTC