Sunday, 30 September 2012
Saturday, 29 September 2012
Friday, 28 September 2012
Thursday, 27 September 2012
- RE: Call for Review: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM)
- Minutes for Teleconference on 27 September 2012
- Re: Agenda EvalTF today
- Re: Agenda EvalTF today
- Re: Agenda EvalTF today
- Re: Agenda EvalTF today
- AW: Agenda EvalTF today
- Re: Agenda EvalTF today
- RE: Agenda EvalTF today
- Agenda EvalTF today
Monday, 24 September 2012
Friday, 21 September 2012
- Re: Questions to be asking ourselves if/when we use our draft methodology to evaluate some websites
- Minutes for Teleconference on 20 September 2012
- Questions to be asking ourselves if/when we use our draft methodology to evaluate some websites
- comments for WCAG-EM
- Re: Call for Review: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM)
- wrong list - apologies for the noise! (was Re: New Public Working Draft of Methodology)
- RE: Call for Review: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM)
- Automated testing
- Comment on 3.3
- Think 3.1.4 needs to be reconsidered, at least for sites that have more than one web team.
Thursday, 20 September 2012
- New Public Working Draft of Methodology
- RE: Agenda EvalTF
- RE: Agenda EvalTF
- Re: Agenda EvalTF
- Re: Agenda EvalTF
- AW: Agenda EvalTF
- regrets - Re: Agenda EvalTF
- Agenda EvalTF
Friday, 14 September 2012
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Monday, 17 September 2012
Friday, 14 September 2012
- changes to 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
- Fwd: Minutes for Teleconference on 12 September 2012
- Fwd: Minutes WCAG 13 Sep 2012
Thursday, 13 September 2012
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
Friday, 14 September 2012
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Re: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- RE: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- RE: Randomly choosing pages
- AW: Randomly choosing pages
- RE: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- RE: Randomly choosing pages
- Re: Randomly choosing pages
- Randomly choosing pages
- RE: Minutes for Teleconference on 13 September 2012
Thursday, 13 September 2012
- Minutes for Teleconference on 13 September 2012
- Regrets
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
- Re: EvalTF Agenda
- Re: [input requested] 3.4.2 Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible (Optional)
Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
- Two comments Methodology doc
- EvalTF new documents for review
- EvalTF Agenda
- AW: AT Accessibility Support required across the web site.
Monday, 10 September 2012
- Fwd: Minutes WCAG 06 Sep 2012
- AT Accessibility Support required across the web site.
- Minutes for Teleconference on 6 September 2012
Saturday, 8 September 2012
Friday, 7 September 2012
Thursday, 6 September 2012
- RE: 3.1.4 Step 1.d: Define the Context of Website Use
- 3.1.4 Step 1.d: Define the Context of Website Use
- evaltf-ISSUE-9 (Sampling): Refine the sampling procedure to ensure being representative [WCAG-EM - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0]
- RE: EvalTF new Editor Draft available
- evaltf-ISSUE-8 (Numbering): Numbering of sections and steps [WCAG-EM - Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0]
- Re: Agenda EvalTF Telco - regrets
- Regrets
- RE: Agenda EvalTF Telco - regrets
- RE: EvalTF new Editor Draft available
- Re: Agenda EvalTF Telco - regrets
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
- Re: Thoughts about the differentiation of reporting types (Basic | Detailed | In-depth)
- Re: Thoughts about the differentiation of reporting types (Basic | Detailed | In-depth)
- RE: Thoughts about the differentiation of reporting types (Basic | Detailed | In-depth)
- Thoughts about the differentiation of reporting types (Basic | Detailed | In-depth)
- Re: New Editor Draft EvalTF for review
- EvalTF new Editor Draft available