- From: Michael S Elledge <elledge@msu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:44:30 -0400
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Everyone-- Thank you for the notes--you certainly had a productive meeting! One thought to add (about the definition/examples of a web page): To me, the key is that it is content delivered via a web interface. That would include not only include a traditional HTML-based web page delivered through a browser, but also a server-based application that has its own portal/interface built with Java (or some other proprietary code), or, alternatively, an interactive PDF form delivered as part of a website. I just want to be sure that we don't fall into the trap (or that readers of our methodology assume) that the evaluation process applies only to html delivered through a web browser like Firefox. That was a limitation of WCAG 1.0 that WCAG 2.0 was supposed to remedy (platform/technology agnostic). So my suggestion would be to include the other two instances (I'm sure there are others) as examples, too. Mike On 10/29/2012 1:30 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/29-eval-minutes.html> > -- Michael S. Elledge Associate Director Usability/Accessibility Research and Consulting Michigan State University Kellogg Center 219 S. Harrison Rd Room 93 East Lansing, MI 48824 517-353-8977
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:45:08 UTC