- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:23:54 +0200
- To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- CC: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Eric, Here is an attempted re-write your question for your consideration: # For which purposes do you evaluate websites: - (checkbox) Provide in-depth analyses to guide website owners - (checkbox) Monitor the accessibility of a website over time - (checkbox) Final check before releasing or purchasing a website - (checkbox) Provide label or other certificate of conformance - (checkbox) Do large-scale evaluation of many websites - (checkbox) Other - please specify below (text) # Do you select sample pages for evaluation based on: - (radio) Structured sampling only - (radio) Random sampling only - (radio) Both structured and random sampling # Please specify any tools you use to help you select the sample, and how you use these tools for sampling. (text) # If you use structured sampling, how do you select the individual web pages? (text) # If you use random sampling, how do you select the individual web pages? (text) # If you do evaluation for different purposes, how does the purpose of the evaluation influence your selection of sample pages? (text) # How does the size of the website influence your selection? (text) # How do you adjust your sampling approach for websites that are heavily template-driven? (text) # How do you adjust your sampling approach for web applications? (text) # Do you look out for widgets, snippets, and other web page components to avoid re-evaluating them every time they appear on a website? If so, how do you include them and the pages that they are integrated into the website? (text) # How do you identify and sample the functionality (processes) provided on a website? (text) # Do you select further sample pages based upon results from an initial selection (eg. to balance web page types or success criteria)? (text) # Please feel free to provide further thoughts or comments about how you approach sampling. (text) I wonder if we need to break some of these down even more so that we are asking ourselves very specific questions? Or maybe that will be a future iteration where we want to find out more details? Not sure. Best, Shadi On 2.10.2012 15:02, Velleman, Eric wrote: > Dear EvalTF, > > In our last telco we discussed opening a group only survey about random sampling. This would then provide input to draft a first text. > > Please add questions to the list below that may be relevant to draft a first text about random sampling. Here are a few from the last telco and my own additions. Please mark them with YES or NO to delete or keep and add questions as you like: > > - How do you collect pages? > - How do you collect pages in web-applications? > - Is there a difference between large and small websites in the manner you collect the pages? > - Is there a difference between large and small websites in the size of the sample? > - Do you collect a random sample? > - Do you think random sampling is necessary? and why? > - What portion of your sample is randomly selected? > - How do you collect randomly (do you count pages..)? > - If you use tools for sampling? > - Are tools sufficient to collect a sample? > - Should the random sample be other pages than the ones already included in Step 3? > - ... > - ... > - ... > > Sampling is now in our methodology in section 3.3 Step 3 Select a Representative Sample. The current version of the methodology lets you select a representative sample including Common Web Pages of the Website, Exemplar Instances of Web Pages, Other Relevant Web Pages and Complete Processes. Random sampling is not included. > > The endresult for this survey would be about 10 to 15 questions. > We could set the max for answers to 100 words per question. > Kindest regards, > > Eric > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 14:24:43 UTC